Like, interest, and suppression from viewpoint out of close options
Gonzaga, Grams. C., Haselton, Yards. G., Smurda, J., Davies, M. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Advancement and you will People Conclusion, 29(2), 119–126.
Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. M. (2000). The area from accessory within the individual mating. Review of Standard Psychology, 4(2), 186–204.
Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, An excellent. (2002). Websites contradiction revisited. Journal off Social Things, 58(1), 49–74.
Kraut, Roentgen., Patterson, Yards., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Web sites paradox: A social technical one decreases social engagement and you can psychological better-becoming? Western Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.
Kreider, Roentgen.M., & Areas, J. Yards. (2001). Matter, time, and you may duration of marriage ceremonies and you can divorces. Latest Inhabitants Accounts, 70-80, (Washington, DC: U.S. Census Agency, 2005).
Lemieux, Roentgen., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional study out-of intimacy, interests, and you can connection: Assessment the latest assumptions of your own triangular concept out-of like. Psychological Profile, 90(3,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.90.step 3.1009-1014
Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, E. (2004). Effect top regarding carrying out bad: Societal evaluations within this romantic matchmaking. Diary from Character and you will Public Psychology, 87(1), 80–95.
Maner, J. K., Miller, S. ungarsk pige hot L., Rouby, D. An excellent., & Gailliot, Yards. T. (2009). Intrasexual vigilance: The new implicit cognition out of intimate rivalry. Diary out-of Identification and you will Social Mindset, 97(1), 74–87.
A great. (2001)mitment and you may matchmaking repair mechanisms
Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. A great., & Gonzaga, Grams. C. (2008). Automated inattention to help you glamorous solutions: The evolved mindset off relationships maintenance. Progression and you may Person Choices, 29(5), 343–349.
pold, B. Elizabeth. (1981). Sequential research from disagreement and you can accord inside upset and you may nondistressed relationship couples. Journal regarding Asking and you can Systematic Psychology, 49(4), 554–567.
McKenna, K. Y. A., Green, Good. S., Gleason, Meters. J. (2002). Matchmaking creation on the web: What is the big interest? Record out-of Societal Affairs, 58(1), 9–31.
The great benefits of confident illusions: Idealization therefore the design regarding fulfillment inside the romantic relationships
Neff, L. Good., & Karney, B. Roentgen. (2002). Self-evaluation objectives into the close matchmaking: A type of worldwide improvement and particular confirmation. Within the P. Noller & J. A. Feeney (Eds.), Understanding ents throughout the examination of couples correspondence (pp. 32–58). Ny, NY: Cambridge College or university Push.
Obegi, J. H. (2008). The development of the customer-therapist bond from the contact regarding accessory concept. Psychotherapy: Concept, Search, Routine, Education, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330
Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). The fresh new personal keeping track of program: Enhanced sensitiveness in order to social signs since the an adaptive a reaction to social different. When you look at the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The social outcast: Ostracism, social difference, rejection, and you may bullying (pp. 213–226). Ny, NY: Mindset Press.
Pierce, T., & Lydon, J. Age. (2001). International and you will particular relational patterns regarding connection with societal affairs. Journal off Identity and you may Social Mindset, 80(4), 613–631.
Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. A beneficial., Tran, S., ). Attachment and advice seeking when you look at the intimate matchmaking. Identity and you can Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.
Ross, L. R., & Spinner, B. (2001). General and you can particular attachment representations within the adulthood: Is there a love?. Diary Out-of Social And personal Relationships, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001
Rusbult, C. Elizabeth., Olsen, Letter., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. For the J. Harvey & A beneficial. Wenzel (Eds.), Intimate intimate relationship: Restoration and enhancement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schul, Y., & Vinokur, A beneficial. D. (2000). Projection privately feeling certainly partners once the a function of the newest similarity within common feel. Character And you may Public Mindset Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008
Seligman, C., Fazio, R. H., & Zanna, M. P. (1980). Aftereffects of salience out-of extrinsic advantages for the taste and you will enjoying. Diary of Character and Social Therapy, 38(3), 453–460.