Love, desire, while the suppression of view off romantic choice
Gonzaga, Grams. C., Haselton, M. Grams., Smurda, J., Davies, M. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Evolution and you will People Choices, 29(2), 119�126.
Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. Meters. (2000). The area out of accessory in the people mating. Report about Standard Psychology, 4(2), 186�204.
Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A good. (2002). Sites contradiction reviewed. Log regarding Public Items, 58(1), 49�74.
Kraut, Roentgen., Patterson, Meters., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet sites paradox: A personal technical you to definitely reduces social involvement and mental better-getting? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017�1031.
Some great benefits of confident illusions: Idealization together with framework out of fulfillment into the personal dating
Kreider, R.Meters., & Areas, J. Yards. (2001). Amount, time, and time of marriages and divorces. Current Populace Account, 70-80, (Arizona, DC: You.S. Census Agency, 2005).
Lemieux, Roentgen., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional data of intimacy, hobbies, and you can partnership: Evaluation the newest assumptions of your own triangular idea away from love. Emotional Profile, 90(step three,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.90.3.1009-1014
Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, Elizabeth. (2004). Perception ideal from the performing tough: Personal comparisons within romantic relationship. Log from Character and Public Psychology, 87(1), 80�95.
Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. A great., & Gailliot, M. T. (2009). Record from Personality and you will Societal Mindset, 97(1), 74�87.
Intrasexual vigilance: The brand new implicit cognition off close competition
Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. A good., & Gonzaga, G. C. (2008). Automatic inattention so you’re able to glamorous alternatives: Brand new developed psychology off relationship repair. Evolution and you may Peoples Conclusion, 29(5), 343�349.
pold, B. Elizabeth. (1981). Sequential studies away from disagreement and you may agreement in the disappointed and you may nondistressed relationship lovers. Journal regarding Consulting and you will Medical Mindset, 49(4), 554�567.
McKenna, K. Y. A., Eco-friendly, An excellent. S., Gleason, M. J. (2002). Relationship development on the web: What’s the larger destination? Record off Social Factors, 58(1), 9�31.
Neff, L. Good., & Karney, B. Roentgen. (2002). Self-investigations aim inside the personal relationship: A type of around the globe enhancement and you will particular confirmation. From inside the P. Noller & J. Good. Feeney (Eds.), Information ents in the examination of few interaction (pp. 32�58). Nyc, NY: Cambridge College or university Force.
Obegi, J. H. (2008). The development of the customer-therapist thread from lens away from accessory principle. Psychotherapy: Principle, Browse, Behavior, Education, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330
Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). The fresh social keeping track of program: Improved sensitiveness to public cues once the an adaptive a reaction to social exception to this rule. For the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The latest public outcast: Ostracism, personal exception, rejection, and you may intimidation (pp. 213�226). New york, NY: Psychology Press.
Enter, T., & Lydon, J. Elizabeth. (2001). All over the world and you can certain relational activities on the connection with public connections. Journal out of Personality and you will Societal Psychology, 80(4), 613�631.
Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. Good., Tran, S., ). Attachment and you will information seeking to okcupid vs match login into the intimate matchmaking. Identification and Public Therapy Bulletin, 33(3), 422�438.
Ross, L. R., & Spinner, B. (2001). Standard and certain accessory representations inside adulthood: Could there be a relationship?. Log Of Societal And personal Relationship, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001
Rusbult, C. E., Olsen, Letter., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. A beneficial. (2001)mitment and you will relationship repair components. Into the J. Harvey & A good. Wenzel (Eds.), Romantic close matchmaking: Restoration and you can enhancement (pp. 87�113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schul, Y., & Vinokur, Good. D. (2000). Projection truly impact certainly spouses since the a function of the new resemblance inside their common feel. Identification And you will Societal Psychology Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008
Seligman, C., Fazio, Roentgen. H., & Zanna, Meters. P. (1980). Results of salience out of extrinsic perks to the preference and loving. Journal out of Identity and you may Societal Psychology, 38(3), 453�460.